The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar graph compares three different types of phone calls, namely local line, national and international line, and mobiles in terms of the amount of time spent by the people in the United Kingdom over the course of 8 years.
Overall, it is obvious that both local line and mobiles experienced an upward trend in the number of minutes for calling, throughout the period shown. While national and international line fluctuated but still remained the highest figures.
According to the chart, mobiles were the least using telephone in the UK. In 1995, it stood at considerably under 10 billions of minutes, compared to slightly below 40 billions of national or international phone calls. The figures for mobile's calling rose dramatically from under 10 billion to around 45 billion in 2002. Similarly, there was a considerable rise in the minute number of the national and international line with nearly 60 billion in the year 2002.
In comparison, a fluctuation was seen in the local line's calling minutes within 8 years. The figures grew slowly by 1999 then had a stable fall in the following years. The amount of time spent on the local line reached its peak at approximately 90 billion in 1999, which was at least 2 times higher than the others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | rchauhan.micro | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kulwa | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Vo My Anh | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- the chart show the amount of time that 10 to 15-years-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on the games consoles on the average school day in the UK. 84
- the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 84
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 billion'.
Suggestion: 10 billion
...In 1995, it stood at considerably under 10 billions of minutes, compared to slightly below 40 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 billion'.
Suggestion: 40 billion
... of minutes, compared to slightly below 40 billions of national or international phone calls. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, then, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92924528302 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71921995678 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6435885654 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194389712979 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805373907503 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645624941365 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102945814116 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106361870248 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.