TPO 49
The reading and the lecture are both about the humpback whales where their migration on long distance is often puzzling. The reading passage claims three theories that support the idea that humpback whales navigate by stars. As opposed to, the lecturer who counters-argues that viewpoint, trying to prove that these three theories do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that humpback whales seem to be intelligent enough to use stars to navigate by. In addition, their brain have a high degree of complexity. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that are other animals such as ducks
which are not intelligent enough compare to whales and they use the same way of navigation. Consequently, these has nothing to do with their intelligence but with their instinct.
The second argument the author gives is that whales migrate in straight lines. So, they can orient themselves better. However, the lecturer cannot be more outrages, explaining that are other evidence that shows that humpback whales have a bio-magnet in their brain that help them to follow the Earth's magnetic field. So, the sensitivity toward Earth's magnetic field would allow them to now their trajectory.
Lastly, on one hand, the reading passage points out that spy hopping is a unusual behavior that helps whales to float straight up and look upward. Nevertheless, the professor declares that other animals that do not migrate such as sharks use this behavior, too. In part of that, whales do that during the day which do not indicate the looking of stars,
In conclusion, although, the text suggest three theories that support the navigation of whales by stars, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive.
- Tpo 36 3
- The author states about he reasons of sending people to an asteroid to form a colonization is the best option. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremost 73
- Should people learn the foreign language by going to the country that speaks the language? 60
- The author states the methods of protecting the forest trees oaks from the spread of dangerous P. ramorum fungus. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter - argues that viewpoint trying to prove these three methods do not seem convincing.First and foremost 80
- There is a drastic contrast between different types of people on whether people perform well when they do one task at a time or doing multi tasks and perform bad. While, it is contradicted by many that people people could be able to do different things bu 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and, the reading passage points out that spy hopping is a unusual behavior that h...
^^
Line 8, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...passage points out that spy hopping is a unusual behavior that helps whales to f...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, lastly, look, nevertheless, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19434628975 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60345146297 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537102473498 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5276255381 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395293771882 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136093428675 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720055399363 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192821895078 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399498508475 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.