Some people say that in all levels of education from schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Education is now mandatory for all human beings on earth with equal importance theoretical and practical knowledge. This raises a claim of pedagogy being unequal in primary as well as in tertiary institutes. According to people, more than required time is spent on understanding principles. As a result, children cannot acquire adequate practical knowledge which is more essential. I completely agree with this claim. Supporting points for my claim are discussed below.
The current education system is theory oriented. Throughout the leaning at institutions, principles and facts are given more importance in classrooms as well as in exams. For example, the teacher teaches scientific principles in-depth in school but their applications in the real world are never explained. Consequently, pupils have knowledge without any awareness of its usage. Likewise, in universities, professors give priority to the lectures and books instead of workshops and practical labs.
Moreover, another possible reason behind an imbalance of education is an insufficient dedication to practical real-world example and understanding of its linking with theory. In fact, reality is too different and complex as compared to basic theoretical principles which are taught in primary and tertiary education. For example, in the bachelor of computer science, basic computer languages and their simple examples are taught. However, real-world applications are way complex programs with a mixture of computer languages. This proves that students have knowledge but they don’t know how to apply. According to research, only a quarter of the total study time is given to pragmatic examples which is less than required.
In conclusion, I think that the current education system utilizes most of their time on facts which creates an imbalance by decreasing the dedicated time for practical. Ideally, it should have a balance of both and that can be achieved by moving focus towards practical applications rather than theories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.1.describe the training course you want to do2.explain what the company could do to help you3.say how the course will be useful f 73
- You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter- describe the training course you want to do- explain what the company could do to 73
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes. 61
- Some people say that in all levels of education from schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people believe that everyone should be free to make their own lifestyle choices even if those choices are unhealthy Other people think that the government should intervene to influence people s choices for example by putting high taxes on unhealthy p 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60855263158 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02073104549 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4124277573 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7368421053 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123487287776 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351977829562 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305557258675 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771729741641 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016255579098 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.