n Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In some countries like Britain, when some people get older they move to an old age home to live with people of the same kind, with better medical facilities. In certain circumstances, the government pays for this care, while in other situations the family bears the cost for this facility. I'm of a balanced opinion. In some cases, countries could contribute and in other cases children could also provide for their parent’s upkeep.
To embark upon, In Many Asian countries where the economy is not developed in comparison to countries like the USA, the old-age care facilities can't be borne by the government due to many financial constraints. Families, therefore, let their grandparents or old parents live them, so their health and well-being can be taken care by the family themselves. While the cost for the same is borne by family. Another thing to consider is that, when many basic infrastructure issues of these developing or underdeveloped countries are still be fixed, the government would find it difficult to provide financial assistance for aged people. In very rare occasions the government would provide financial aid to aging people who have worked for the government, even in these cases the frugal pension given to them do not cover the medical expenses. Therefore, the major cost is still borne by the members of their family.
Secondly, there are many developed countries like the UK and France where old age care facilities are provided by the government itself. One of the main reasons for the same is that the government has a lot of surplus funds after attending to the basic needs of its citizens. Also, the medical facilities in these countries are well organized and rightly equipped that it can facilitate options like old age care, childcare etc. In a few instances, In Scandinavian, countries like Norway, which provide homes for the aged equipped with proper health care services in a friendly and a blissful atmosphere. Hence, it is considered number one country for senior citizens to stay in.
To conclude with, the old age care facility should be provided by the government in developed countries, whereas, in developing or underdeveloped countries the cost should be borne by the families.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-11-04 | Arshdeep0900 | 78 | view |
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of maternity leave?Which side do you feel outweighs the other? 89
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past Why is this the case Is it a negative or positive development 95
- Some people think that the main factors influencing a child’s development these days are things such as tv, friends and music. Others believe that family still remains very important.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 89
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...amily bears the cost for this facility. Im of a balanced opinion. In some cases, c...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ke the USA, the old-age care facilities cant be borne by the government due to many ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, another thing, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08967391304 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8274753592 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494565217391 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6055756307 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0625 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323916273829 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107721359793 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817199108155 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213903377632 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757143397555 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.