Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make?
Has this been a positive or negative development?
These days, owing to the development of technology, the interaction in between individuals and others has changed. In accordance with this statement, this essay will explain the contributing factors of this issue and also put forward a number of the impact of it.
In regard to the argument above, the advancement of the technology itself is going to render numerous benefits and drawbacks for all people across the globe. According to the previous statement, all individuals do not have to meet in person if they want to interact with others, they merely need to have a temporary gadget which is capable of connecting them to other persons. Because of this enhancement, a majority of humans, today, would rather contact others via modern tools rather than meet in person.
In accordance with the influence of this issue, the improvement of it is going to provide several positive advantages to all people. Regarding this fruitful impact, it, first and foremost, will make them easier to be connected with other persons. Second but not less crucial, it is apparent that they, additionally, do not have to spend more money for commuting them to meet others. Last but not least, the existence of it will confer more opportunities for all humans to produce a new business which related to the communication via gadget.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that the presence of the temporary technology is going to bestow various beneficial influences for all people. Thus, in order to make all individuals solely obtaining a fruitful impact, all persons have to maintain and control the utilisation of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- The map shows the change of museum from 1957 to 2007 76
- the pie charts and table give information about the total value of fish imported to the us between 1988 and 2000. 78
- The diagrams below show the campus of Riversdale university in 1973 and 2010 65
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04119850187 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83569823403 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2709090303 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.363636364 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172198596431 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662612565184 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416680290919 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105329817004 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335996097404 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.