For the successful development of a country, the government should focus its budget on young children's education rather than on universities.
From delegates voting in the general assembly of the United Nations to old woman working in small retailers, people surviving in the society all have been educated and admit the significance of education. No one will deny, for a country to prosper, education is crucial, yet people sometimes debate over whether elementary school should receive more government funding than universities. From my perspective, universities shall be sponsored more by the government as they usually cost more to function and can attract people with skills
One major reason the government to spend more money on universities than education for pupils is that universities requires a significant amount of money to function. University is a place for students to advance their study and bring it to a higher level. Such goal sure calls for higher level of material support. For instance, chemistry classes in the university involves using of high-tech laboratories and different types of expensive gadgets. Without such equipment, it is not possible for college students to conduct experiments, which is their primary task to do in college. While young children, varying from the age of five to ten, do not have the need towards such expenses. Their designed goal is simply to recognize the name of the elements presented on their textbook, and ,under some circumstances, the relevant costs can be covered through the student's tution fee. Thus, the reasonable choice for a government is to fund the universities because the financial demand of a university and young age education is totally different.
Another important reason is that good universities are crucial for a country to attract talented experts. University is a place where scientists carry out their researches and guide their students. It is very common for experts throughout the world to go a certain country's renowned university in order to future conduct their research. Take the United States as an example, experts from every walk of life would fly there so that their goal can be fulfilled with the help of some of the greatest universities in the world. It is fair for people to suggest that these experts contributed to the development of America's technology and formed a mature research system there. Such positive effect, which many country have dreamt of, cannot be achieved by funding early education.
In conclusion, though both early education and college education are of significance to a country, the benefits and costs of college education entails the government to put priority in funding colleges.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-11 | curiousnoob | 83 | view |
- Honest is the important quality in choosing a leader 90
- For the successful development of a country, the government should focus its budget on young children's education rather than on universities. 83
- Social media is a good way to express personal views 87
- Honest is the important quality in choosing a leader 90
- Celebrities should have privacy like everyone else 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lements presented on their textbook, and ,under some circumstances, the relevant c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24757281553 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86946588761 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0165490442 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.176470588 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2352941176 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177873935774 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560269007152 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528127703418 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113714024974 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404665831926 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.002688172 210% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.