The graph below shows the electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2010
Given is the graph illustrating how much energy produced in France by 4 different sources over a period of 30 years, starting from 1980.
Overall, it is evident that while the amount of energy generated by nuclear and renewables witnessed an increase , the opposite was true for thermal and hydroelectric sources over the period. it is also notable that the use of the nuclear power was the most common source for energy production.
In 1980, there was 50 terawatt hours of energy produced from nuclear power, while the figures for renewables was negligible (approximately 0 TW-h). The following 25 years saw a dramatic growth in the amount of energy generated from nuclear source, to somewhere in the vicinity of 460 TW-h , followed by a drop to below 450 terawatt hours in 2010. Meanwhile, before climbing to about 25 TW-h in the last year, the amount produced from renewables stayed stable at approximately 0 TW-h from 1980 to 2000.
In stark contrast, in 1980, there was approximately 125 TW-h produced from thermal source, which is significantly higher than that of hydroelectric, at 70 TW-h. over the next 25 years, despite some fluctuations, both these two sources stayed unchanged at around 50 TW-h.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Amy Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Clara 22222 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ear and renewables witnessed an increase , the opposite was true for thermal and h...
^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... hydroelectric sources over the period. it is also notable that the use of the nuc...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t common source for energy production. In 1980, there was 50 terawatt hours of...
^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy production. In 1980, there was 50 terawatt hours of energy produced from n...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...to somewhere in the vicinity of 460 TW-h , followed by a drop to below 450 terawat...
^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear, the amount produced from renewables stayed stable at approximately 0 TW-h fr...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pproximately 0 TW-h from 1980 to 2000. In stark contrast, in 1980, there was ap...
^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...than that of hydroelectric, at 70 TW-h. over the next 25 years, despite some fluctua...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01492537313 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84569645316 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2216445111 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11654455824 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558157078975 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567192856801 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711361764465 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600098321791 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.