The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these cause affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart provides information about the four main causes of land degradation globally. The table illustrates the reasons for degraded land by regions throughout the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that the largest portion of total land degraded was in Europe and this was caused mainly by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing.
it can be seen from the graph that 65% of land degradation stemmed from over-grazing and deforestation, 35% and 30% respectively. Similarly, the percentage of worldwide land devastation stood at slightly less than a third. However, other causes constituted the smallest proportion of earth degradation globally (7%).
Regarding the causes of land damage by region, the biggest part of total land degraded was in Europe (23%) compared to North America and Oceania (5% and 13% respectively). To be more precise, deforestation and over-cultivation made up nearly a tenth each of entire earth degradation in Europe, while over-grazing comprised 5.5% of all land devastation. Talking about North America, over-cultivation contributed considerably to total land degradation by 3.3% compared to deforestation (0.2%) and over-grazing (1.5%). In contrast, over-cultivation account for 0% of total land degraded in Oceania, whereas the biggest percentage of devastation made up over-grazing (13%) and deforestation constituted around 2% of land degradation in Oceania.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-13 | Vikuns | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-10 | Pham To Anh Dao | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share information in research, business and the academic world. Some others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., over-cultivation and over-grazing. it can be seen from the graph that 65% of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 3.97073170732 529% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75362318841 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57651092152 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9070150422 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.1 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132111183414 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767074967607 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640617732505 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114989465842 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852891248771 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.