Bar chart : amount spent on consumer goods (Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain).
The figure elucidates the number of spending on buyer goods in four different nations. At first glance, it is evident that Britain has the highest number of consumer goods in comparison with other states.
To begin with, the amount of spending for consumer goods in Britain is higher in all aspects rather than the other countries. In contrast, Austria has the lowest number of consumer goods in console games, outdoor game accessories and cosmetics, which made up at just above a fourth of 580, well under 145 and well across two-thirds of 210 respectively, and it had the second highest score for the other aspects.
In accordance with the other two states, over the entire period, Belgium had the lowest score for books, toys and cameras, which constituted approximately at well over two times of 70, well under a tenth of 1500 and a half of 290 respectively. Nonetheless, in the other aspects, it placed in the third rank just beneath Spain which used to have a higher number for all aspects rather than Belgium.
- Some people think that professional athletes make good role models for young people, while others believe they don’t.Discuss both view and give own opinion. 78
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that parents have the greatest influence on their child academic development, while others think that a teacher has more influence. discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- 'The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main. 73
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d cosmetics, which made up at just above a fourth of 580, well under 145 and well...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nonetheless, second, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84571428571 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56793413356 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8184439325 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177652792273 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996575043853 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583548697008 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127081115214 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464786913457 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.