Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better?
In my view, I think college students need to take classes in many subjects instead of just one. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following passage.
First of all, the undergraduate will be able to gain a wide variety of knowledge through myriad areas of subjects. As the proverb says “knowledge is power”. It is always better to excel in multiple areas to reach our career. Finding jobs in contemporary situation is difficult, because of high competition. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Four years ago, I graduated from California University. I studied English as a major subject. Even though I was a gold medal student; it was very difficult for me to find a job. After that, I thought to study more, including a different subject that was in demand during that period. I decided to do exercise physiology, and I did it with A grade. As a result, I gained more information’s, but not limited to body systems, kinesiology, anatomy, and musculoskeletal. As soon as I finish my studies, I got a job in one of the prestigious University as a physical educator; consequently, I started to earn more money. If I had not chosen to study more including the different field of subject, I would not be thriving today.
Moreover, students will get a plethora of job opportunities. Presently, due to the job recession, even an educated individual is unemployed. So, It is good to be talented in many aspects rather than in one domain. For instance, my brother studied MBBS; eventually, he started his own clinic. He was getting only fewer patients; hence, earning very less. Because now a day’s patient approaches to a doctor who is more qualified, like masters or even higher like Ph.D. On the other hand, even I did my medicine; and also masters in hospital administration. As a result, I had two different fields of knowledge; I got a better job opportunity as Operations manager in Texas women’s hospital with a high pay scale. In my opinion, If I had not gained information’s in multi-facet I would not be getting a better job offer that day.
To recapitulate, for the aforementioned reasons. I strongly believe that it is very beneficial for pupils to excel in a wide variety of topics. This is because it provides them to get better employment opportunities and also it improves their knowledge when there is a hard time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people should sometimes do things they do not enjoy doing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Firstly, genetically modified trees are designed to be hardier than nature trees; that is, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. In Hawaii, for example, a new pest-resistant species of papaya trees has been developed in respo 70
- Social media, such as facebook, influences children in a positive way. What isyour position? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 78
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, as to, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83535108959 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23438833074 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556900726392 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8263468163 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8076923077 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8846153846 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140674762049 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338903662957 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526810013967 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953692834573 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685851168834 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.