The supporters of genetic research claim that genetic engineering is the answer to many problems and we t should be conducted and results should be rigorously applied? Is it true that genetic research has more benefits compared throwbacks?
Without doubt, standard of living had improved drastically with the application of increased knowledge of science and technology. Therefore, those who support scientific findings of genes have claimed that genetic modification is the solution to several challenges; and so should be encouraged. My opinion is that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
Apparently, there are lots of positive implications of genetic engineering. The major one is the suggestion that average life span could be extended. this has been an important desire of many people, for years because life is too short according to them. so if genetic science finally achieve that, it will meet an age long need for longevity. Furthermore, DNA science has been predicted to provide treatments to diseases that have been considered untreatable. Evidently, quality of lives will be better if terminal diseases such as cancer and AIDS, could be treated.
Conversely, there are also downsides to DNA technology. A fatal one is overpopulation, which will put more too much stress on the already delicate environment. this is because the natural resources will no longer be enough to cater for more people living, since deaths cannot put balance to the new additions from from births. In addition to that, any mistake or mutation in the research could amount to great disaster. For instance, some science fiction movies predicted monsters could be mistakenly created, which will invariably end the world itself.
Summing up, the suggestion that DNA science could resolve lots of health issues is beneficial because it can prolong average life expectancies and also provide means of treating serious illnesses. Nevertheless, venturing into genetic engineering have grave consequences as over population and mistakes in the process could terminate human existence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-17 | jacelynenursalim | 62 | view |
| 2019-05-25 | drsnn | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Adewumi Akinwale | 79 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Adewumi Akinwale | 84 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 the information. Select and describe main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years. Would it be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The charts below the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- Being a celebrity- such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...at average life span could be extended. this has been an important desire of many pe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...se life is too short according to them. so if genetic science finally achieve that...
^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for longevity. Furthermore, DNA science has been predicted to provide treatments...
^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ss on the already delicate environment. this is because the natural resources will n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...cannot put balance to the new additions from from births. In addition to that, any mistak...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, conversely, finally, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51418439716 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9693727771 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4475522054 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179067852211 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052619592936 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564468375339 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10195601503 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373828581227 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.