International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.
What are your opinions on this?
Over the past 50 years, we have seen a significant increase in global tourism. While some people consider this trend positive, I would contend that overall, international tourism has a negative impact on our lives. My reasons for this are as follows.
First of all, it is an undeniable fact that global tourism has been a great influence on cultural diversity. People in developing countries face everyday, a lot of different cultures and behaviors among tourists from developed countries and this can foster a foundation for them to develop faster and adjust to the modern society easily. Also, when wealthy people holiday in developing countries, they bring a lot of money to the poorer country and this results to economic prosperity.
Further and more importantly, although this cultural and economic trade is considered as a good occurrence, I personally believe that the environmental degradation tourists leave behind is much more disturbing. For instance, Venice in Italy is unfortunately known for sinking right now, and the influx of tourists are not helping either. All the services provided for holidaymaking, including cruise ships, are accelerating the sinking of Venice. Or as an another salient example, the world renowned Kuta Beach in Bali has become heavily polluted in recent years, and once an ecosystem is broken, it is really hard to fix it.
By way of conclusion, even though that the challenges provided by international tourists are not going to decrease in a foreseeable future, I believe that we need a serious public education to inform people about the damages they are causing every year to the world, and more important than that, governments should find a way to regulate this booming abroad holidaymaking.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ty. People in developing countries face everyday, a lot of different cultures and behavi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a salient' or 'another salient'.
Suggestion: a salient; another salient
...celerating the sinking of Venice. Or as an another salient example, the world renowned Kuta Beach ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, really, so, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23131672598 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9308421125 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633451957295 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.5599682253 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173985995947 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640873399042 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062292782012 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107860256413 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624446208165 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.