The chart gives information about UK immigration, emigration and net migration between 1999
and 2008.
The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008.
Overall, the figures for immigration were always higher than emigration, but both rates rose over 10 years. Besides, the net of migration fluctuated throughout the periods.
The number of immigration and emigration increased steadily from 450,000 and 300,000 people in 1999 to reach a peak of 600,000 and around 360,000 people in 2006, respectively. While the figure for immigration decreased slightly to just below 600,000 people in 2008, the number of emigration dropped suddenly to 350,000 people in 2007 before grew again to the highest point 420,000 people in 2008.
From 1999 to 2003, the net migration stayed between 150,000 and 180,000 people. In the last 5 years, except the figure was 150,000 people in 2008, the other number always were higher than 200,000 and reached a peak of 250,000 people in 2004.
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 56
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems willthis cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be takento reduce the impact of ageing populations. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 24.0651302605 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 161.0 315.596192385 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06211180124 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45958027435 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 506.74238477 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6823105568 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15088071248 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101497513129 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101110738158 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131681307974 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107999610217 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 78.4519038076 32% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.