The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates what both British graduates and postgraduates did after their graduation in the year of 2008.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that there was a difference between the number of graduates and postgraduates choosing part-time works. Besides, the number of people following further study register the highest figures in both types of students.
Generally, it could be said that the figure of graduate numbers was as high as 10 times that of postgraduates. Clearly, while graduate numbers doing part-time work stood at roughly 18000 people, this figure was so much lower in the number of postgraduate doing this kind of job which was just about 2500 people. Similarly, there was 3500 graduate students participating voluntary work, whereas it was 345 of postgraduate students who did the same.
Furthermore, it can be seen that either the graduated or the postgraduate cherished to pursue their academic career. Nevertheless, there was a huge gap between the number of graduated students and postgraduate students studying more, which was about 27000 people. A similar data was witnessed in graduate and postgraduate numbers who were unemployed, which were 16235 and 1625, respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.https://ielts-simon.com/.a/6a0120a5bb05d8970c0240a46ef03d200d-pi 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir graduation in the year of 2008. Looking at the graph, it is immediately ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...figures in both types of students. Generally, it could be said that the fig...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raduate students who did the same. Furthermore, it can be seen that either ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, similarly, so, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47120418848 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00859035258 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3333333333 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188935681409 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968116786369 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799683203551 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144464051531 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823166037585 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.