The chart and the table show the rates of cell phone ownership for three groups: students at Jenny school, parents of those students and nationwide.
The chart and the table show the rates of cell phone ownership for three groups: students at Jenny school, parents of those students and nationwide.
The students are the most interesting group. Trought 2002-2016 the ownership of cellphone had abruptly increased. In the beggining of the period the cell phones almost non exist, by 2010 the rates was 20%, but between 2012 and 2016, it jump up 50 points of percentage.
Another group with a improvement in his cell phone ownership is the natiowide. In 2002 the 60% of population had their own devices, for the 2010 this grow up to a 85% , and for the 2016, almost all the populations had one. The flunctuation in those 14 years reached 36%.
However, the group which increase slowly was the parents. From 2002 to 2016 the variation was 30%. Nevertheless, this group begun with a 50% of ownership, being in the top of the chart for 2002. The use for 2016 was an 80%.
Overall, the cell phone ownership have increased over the years, showing a masification on the use of technology. Actually, each person in the nation have a cellphone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | Camila Figueroa | 78 | view |
- The chart and the table show the rates of cell phone ownership for three groups: students at Jenny school, parents of those students and nationwide. 78
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 78
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words 67
- The graph shows the attendance for different types of events in the Grandville Stadium by 2017. Meanwhile, the chart gives the attendance projected for 2020 and 2030, where is we can see an increase of viewers for the next 10 years. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'jumps'?
Suggestion: jumps
... was 20%, but between 2012 and 2016, it jump up 50 points of percentage. Another...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s of percentage. Another group with a improvement in his cell phone ownership...
^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n devices, for the 2010 this grow up to a 85% , and for the 2016, almost all the ...
^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ices, for the 2010 this grow up to a 85% , and for the 2016, almost all the popula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76842105263 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65747939972 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4424427519 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6923076923 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6153846154 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414064863663 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13739578945 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.253851912967 0.0843802449381 301% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288263321395 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.356494579711 0.0819641961636 435% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.