Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people say it leads to environment damage and should be stopped. To what extent do you agree?
Economic growth is the main resource for nations to live and develop. Some people think that the economic growth will help to end world poverty and change people lives, others say it will damage the environment and should find other alternatives and stop ruining it.
On one hand, economic growth is the only solution to end poverty and assist people to live properly. First, there is many solutions can be done and won't impact on environment such as, improve agriculture sector by encouraging people to invest and work in farms. Second, build ecofriendly factories and improve infrastructure, where new job opportunities are available for many unemployment's. For example, in developed countries such as Netherland, they increase their economy by building developed an ecofriendly firm, that won't effect on their people. In my opinion, I agree where poverty cannot be ended by worrying about environment, since there is many ways won't damage it.
On the other hand, people believe that it leads to environment damages, and should find other solutions. First, the number of populations will increase and the demand and daily usages such as homes and cars also, where they will cause air and water pollution. Second, people health will affect negatively due to factories pollution and cutting the forests to build houses, where diseases and the demand on medication will increase and lead to poverty. For example, in African countries due to poverty, government are dealing with the environment in a savage way and causing illness to its people. From my side, I disagree with this point where we can deal with our environment in many developed methods to increase our economy.
As a conclusion, two type of people with different opinions, some think economic growth is the only way to stop poverty and others believe that this way will damage the environment. In my opinion, people can end poverty in many easy habits that won’t impact negatively on the environment and people can live a healthy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | Angrej Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | enassar | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Some people say that the current obsession with technology and the internet means that we are creating a generation of people that have poor social skills. Do you agree with this statement? 73
- Some people say that schools do not do enough to teach young people about health. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Many people think that we have to focus on the extinction of certain animal species, while others think that we should pay attention to the problem of human beings. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Parents think that using computers or tablets will help children's future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are many solutions'?
Suggestion: there are many solutions
... assist people to live properly. First, there is many solutions can be done and wont impact on environm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are many ways'?
Suggestion: there are many ways
...ed by worrying about environment, since there is many ways wont damage it. On the other hand, p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a savage way" with adverb for "savage"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rnment are dealing with the environment in a savage way and causing illness to its people. From...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12158054711 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70630077679 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48632218845 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6657509037 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27601046007 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100395744592 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808941500527 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189957827377 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625229423496 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.