Some people say that working couples must equally share the household responsibility in all cultures across the world. However, others simply do not agree with this view. What side of the given views do you agree with?
There is no doubt that in the fast paced life responsibilities of a couple have increased. Some people think that the couples who work should be equally responsible for the domestic chores; whereas, others believe that the responsibility of husband and wife should vary. In my opinion, it is important for the working couples to equally share the duties of the household.
There are many reasons why I agree with the people who are of the view that the household duties should be equally divided among the working couples. Firstly, sharing responsibility creates happiness and strong family ties as the burden of maintaining a healthy lifestyle is not the responsibility of only one person. Nowadays, expenses have increased due to the change in the lifestyle; thus, putting the whole responsibility on a single shoulder is totally unethical. Secondly, sharing duties leads to a stress free life for both the husband and the wife. For instance, working couples can enjoy a better lifestyle because of the double income.
On the other hand, there are people who believe that domestic chores are the responsibility of a woman even if she works outside of the home. This opinion stems from the age old belief that men are not responsible for cooking, cleaning or raising children. It made perfect sense in the olden days when men were the only bread winners and women confined themselves to their home. In this day and age when both the husband and the wife work this mentality cannot be encouraged.
In conclusion, it is crucial for the working couples to share household duties because it simply is not possible for a woman to have a full time job and still manage all household duties on her own. Therefore, sharing the household responsibilities is imperative if the couples want to enjoy a happy family life and financial freedom.
- Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods more than ever before in most countries in the world Is this a good or bad development Give your opinion and examples 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situation.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 61
- The overuse of natural resources causes an ultimate exhaust of them. People have been using them to be in swim of new styles such as making new furniture of recent design. This causes a huge harm to the environment. Therefore, government should discourage 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both 56
- Many people use distance-learning progammes (study material, post, TV, the Internet, etc.) to study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or unversity. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...y is not possible for a woman to have a full time job and still manage all household duti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96116504854 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79744215249 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7920938709 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251466557952 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868020111597 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639560089431 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156125177949 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405763316721 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.