The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008.
The pie charts illustrates the employment status of people aged 23 to 65, in Ashby and in the UK, in 2008.
Overall, the national unemployment rate was lower than the rate in Ashby. Moreover, while British people
generally preferred office work, personal service was the most popular profession in Ashby.
The percentage of jobless people in Ashby was 14%, whereas that recorded in the whole nation was only
10%. The percentage of Ashby residents who were employed in office work and shop work were 18% and 14%
respectively, similar to that of the whole of the UK, at 19% and 13% respectively.
In addition, the UK recorded a relatively high proportion of citizens employed in technical work, at 17%,
while the figure for the same type of employment in Ashby was only about half that, at 9%. Furthermore, the
percentage of construction workers and personal service providers in Ashby, at 16% and 21%, were both higher
than the corresponding figures of the UK, at 10% and 17% respectively. Lastly, with regards to professional
occupations, 8% of Ashby residents did this type of work, compared to 14% of the whole population
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008 80
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 89
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthlycontract for four different mobile (cell phones) in aEuropean country from January to September 2002,measured in euro. 78
- moving from rural areas to big cities 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, lastly, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00526315789 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89382282221 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531578947368 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7921225793 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190759009728 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974512911583 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113317356291 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817000441875 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103003590794 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.