Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
The world has been growing in the fast space in different fields. One of these fields is medical knowledge. So scientists usually use animal testing as a useful method in their researches. Some people believe this is an immoral action and we should respect to animals’ lives. However, the other group thinks it is necessary for some medical experiments.
The first group has some reasons for their attitudes. Firstly, they think it is cruel because some scientists just do these experiments for publishing their papers on the net so the benefits of it cannot justify the animals suffering. Secondly, there are other alternatives methods that can be replaces with this method. For example, computer stimulation can be used in most cases and with this way scientists can analyze their data in exact way without any damage to animals. At last but not least, human have no moral right to suffer or kill animals for any purposes even medical researches and the lives of animals should be respected like as other living things.
Clearly, no matter how much evidence exists to the contrary, the fact still remains that animal experiments play an indispensable role in medical breakthroughs. So we cannot ignore the benefits of this method in today’s medical development. If the scientists were not able to use this method for their research, we would have a disaster situation in community health and medicine. Also researchers aim to minimize the suffering that animals experience by using new ways. In addition, some countries are banned animal testing for cosmetic industry that it’s not very serious need for human.
On balance, the mindset that animal testing can actually do more harm than good is not correct because an effective solution should encompass all of the aspects of one subject, not only one aspect such as animal’s right and we should see this issue in a wider canvas that we are able to judge it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Andy Hoang | 80 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | saeedhassani | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | Sasuke0789 | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | Ajayvir | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-29 | harmankaur1607 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 78
- Crime is a big problem in the world; many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 56
- “Prison is the only truly effective form of punishment, because it separates criminals from society.” To what extent do you support this view? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ation in community health and medicine. Also researchers aim to minimize the sufferi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... an effective solution should encompass all of the aspects of one subject, not only one as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, such as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03115264798 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69069444009 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585669781931 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1482657599 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274113655657 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917749071557 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066376254351 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172279548894 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398101296802 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.