In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Who can make significant contribution in any field? This is question of debate and moot subject today. The author of prompt advocates that begineers are more likely to make contribution in any field. However, in my view, past experience in any field is imperial for making any contribution in that field and I am defending my thesis based on two argument points with their evidences and concession on when my thesis may be weakened.
Firstly, people with past experience in any field are more prioritized and lauded in society than any begineer. While this may be prejudiced, it is actually justifiable given risk involve specially to hire novice in job market. This results in more opportunites for experienced rather than that of fledgling youth. For instance, in civil engineering field, experienced engineer has more demand than a new one so this creates enough opportunity for experienced civil engineer to excell in his field. So, experienced person can make significant contribution given the opportunity he may get in his field and for new prodigy there is far less chance than experienced one.
Secondly, the experienced person who have better understanding of their field-- the flaws, advantages, disadvantages and scopes-- can contribute in many ways as he is already exposed in the field. He can indentify the flaws of his field and take part in research to remove these faults and errors. He can even purpose new theories on his field. For instance, a experienced person in computer engineering can find flaws in the operating system and move even further and can try to find remedy in the flaws. So, experience bring deep knowledge in respective field which provides basis for improving his field of study which a new one cannot.
Admittedly, most of the great inventors are no where expert in any field. For instance, Albert Einstien, who defined gravity in unconventional way, was a clerk at that time and Mark Zuckerberg was ordinary student when he started creating largest social networking site. It is true that most of the scientific inventions and discoveries were just by product of some other scientific research. However, even though they were not "experts" in conventional sense but, they had knowledge and their own vision of taking subject matter differently than other do. Even though they didn't have past experience on respective field, they were actually genius and prolific at that time.
In conclusion, the issue is very complex and no vivid verdict can be made on whether naive prodigy can contribute in any field or experienced can. But, above arguments and evidences shows that the experienced one has more chance of contributing in any field then that of begineer.
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 58
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. 83
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated. 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 62
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...tion in any field. However, in my view, past experience in any field is imperial for making any...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on on when my thesis may be weakened. Firstly, people with past experience in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...be weakened. Firstly, people with past experience in any field are more prioritized and l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ew theories on his field. For instance, a experienced person in computer engineer...
^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ttedly, most of the great inventors are no where expert in any field. For instance...
^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o defined gravity in unconventional way, was a clerk at that time and Mark Zucker...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'creating the largest'.
Suggestion: creating the largest
...rg was ordinary student when he started creating largest social networking site. It is true that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 586, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...erently than other do. Even though they didnt have past experience on respective fiel...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 597, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...n other do. Even though they didnt have past experience on respective field, they were actually...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in any field then that of begineer.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12134831461 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92019510514 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503370786517 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8461732418 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.523809524 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1904761905 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249926134914 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921231827577 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842147393759 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14954838008 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672182808939 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.