The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure elucidates the population in two different nations in 2000 and the expected prediction in the following 50 years. At first glance, it is evident that these two countries has the same pattern in the first 30 years and is measured in billion people.
To begin with China, there was a significant upsurge in the number of the population in China in the first 10 years in which it stood at well above a half of 2400 in 2000 and climbed to just below 1200 in 2010. Afterwards, it is predicted that it will increase remarkably, soaring to well across 1400 in the next 20 years. Unexpectedly, it, additionally, is predicted that it will plunge considerably from 2030, which makes up well over 1400, to 2050, which constitutes at just beneath 1400.
Following the similar pattern as in China, 2000 to 2030 will witness a dramatic growth in India’s population where it, initially, upright positioned approximately at a third of 3000 and will soar tremendously to the same number as India’s population in 2030. In contrast, it will still uplift highly to less than 1600 by the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | maryamazizmohammadi1366 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Szprawstyle | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | alifdores | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | jencydalphy | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of boys and girls who participate in 4 kinds of sport outside school hours including the percentage of those who do not 74
- Line graph : channel one news viewing figures. 78
- Some people believe that advertising brings positive effects. Others argue that this has more negative effects. What extent do you agree? 78
- Bar chart : amount spent on consumer goods (Belgium, Spain, Austria and Britain) 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...n the first 30 years and is measured in billion people. To begin with China, there w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79792746114 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85718293464 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9623382298 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199660920095 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821395977241 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656084481363 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127148938363 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224905369669 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.