The pie charts below show the proportions of the total school expenditure in five different sources between 1981 and 2001.
The pie charts below show the proportions of the total school expenditure in five different sources between 1981 and 2001.
Overall, most of the money is spent on teachers’ salaries. Otherwise, the number of other workers’ salaries reduced gradually over 20 years.
The rates of insurance slightly increased from 2% (1981) to 8% (2001). By contrast, the spending on furniture and equipment dropped quickly from 15% (1981) to 5 % (1991) before reached the point of 23% in 2001. There was a small rise in the figure of resources and books from 15% (1981) to 20 % (1991) before it dramatically fell to 9% in 2001.
From 1981 to 1991, the expenditure on teachers’ salaries climbed slightly from 40% to reach a peak of 50%. By contrast, the spending on other workers’salaries reduced gradually from 28% to 22%. In the next ten years, there was a decrease, in the wages of teachers and other workers, from 50% and 22% (1991) to 45% and 15% (2001), respectively.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 89
- The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010. 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 61
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1991 to 45% and 15% 2001, respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85975609756 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10056091835 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3666470819 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284155358308 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152308452703 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.302207367882 0.0843802449381 358% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292318234869 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.410662805347 0.0819641961636 501% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.