Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Hosting international sporting events has been a subject of controversy for quite a time now. Although they might seem as outstanding opportunities for the server to utilize in order to flourish the economy, many are concerned with wasteful lavish as well as the unsustainability of the development. This essay assesses both perspectives to provide a resolution to the issue.
There are numerous examples of nations yielding the eccentric economic boost of hosting the events resulting in prosperity and cultural flourishment. Olympics in this instance, is the grandest sporting event held worldwide. Given that a country does take advantage of the opportunities, desirable results such as economic prosperity, societal progress and improving international stature are assured. These are undeniable gains which can benefit a society greatly. England for an example, integrated development regarding their recent hosting of Olympics into their domestic businesses, hence resulting in substantial economic growth.
From another viewpoint, it is common that overproduction of unsustainable developments occurs during procuring provisions necessary to the games. For instance, despite primary benefits and incomes, certain provisions can inflict devastating long-term expenses. In order for newly established infrastructure and facilities to properly function, they have to be appropriately endorsed into the business- societal cycle; or the majority of constructions have to be removed. Although the mentioned points are simply understandable, implementing them are challenging, whereas, nearly all host countries have suffered post-event drawbacks.
To conclude, a little waste is unpreventable, however these events have had noticeably greater detrimental effects. I profoundly advocate strict regulation towards developments and expenditures associated with holding international sporting events.
- Some people prefer to work for large companies. Some prefer to work for small companies. Which one do you prefer? Give reasons and examples. 89
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, regarding, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28244274809 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.398618681 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679389312977 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.882503001 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138352429478 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486729842404 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489954853024 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836140361958 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302375687294 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.14 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.52 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.