A government’s role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure (roads, water supplies, etc.). All other services (education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is an argument that whether a government should interfere with some social services(like education, health care, social insurance, etc.) except the national defense and the city’s public facilities. In my opinion, a government ought to provide basic public services and supervise private social services at the same time.
One of the reasons is that without the monitor of a government, social services might become more and more commercialize. In that case, the price of education and medical treatment will be higher. Ordinary citizens will lose the fair opportunities of receiving equal community services. Moreover, the quality of private social services is hard to guarantee due to the control power is taken by some big private companies. For example, those enterprises will try to prevent public people benefit from social security to make sure their own profit can get maximum.
On the other hand, others argue that those social services provided by private groups or individuals can improve the quality of services. For example, private hospitals can buy more advanced cure devices to provide the best treatment. By contrast, public hospitals must be funded by a government and lack of money to buy enough equipment, they also only can employ a more limited number of doctors and nurses. As we all know, it is common that it needs to wait a long time to see a doctor in a public hospital. The similar situation happens in a public school.
To summarize, undoubtedly, a government must provide those services which are essential to a country, such as defense capability and urban infrastructure. In addition, a government should play the role of supervisor and continue to provide a base level of fair and inexpensive public services.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment. 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 67
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19014084507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86662972132 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9289453613 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326256148418 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957501812651 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766156142639 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195982103442 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064308357983 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.