TPO43
The reading provides several theories about agnostid's food and behavior. However, the lecture contends that each theory has serious weakness.
The author discuss that agnostids may free-swimming predators due to that other types of primitive arthropods are strongly good at swimming and very active, which differs from what the first idea in the listening that these primitive arthropods are with big and large eyes to have the version and chase their food. In fact, agnostids have tiny eyes and almost blind so they cannot chase other animals unless there is ay special mechanism, but no records can prove that.
The instructor refutes the second theory---agnostids were seafloor dwellers because they may as same as other primitive arthropods and some scientists think they could survive by having dead organisms---by proposing that agnostids are found in multiple geographic areas, which shows that they could move fast. Also, they are unlike the type of seafloor dwellers without the ability to move fast and spread out in many areas.
The professor makes the point that agnostids have large population with the evidence that a vast agnostids fossils are found in different place. Usually, parasites have small group since too many parasites will kill themselves. This point, again, contradicts what the third theory holds that they may like other modern-day arthropods that exist as parasites and live on primitive fish or on other larger arthropods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
...ry has serious weakness. The author discuss that agnostids may free-swimming predat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37826086957 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62250331353 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639130434783 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.0344641275 49.2860985944 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.444444444 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522922957788 0.272083759551 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183550318949 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10035660448 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278378399813 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973040009904 0.0443174109184 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.