The proportion of energy produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010.
The line graph compares the proportion of energy produced from coal in Sweden, France, Denmark and Germany between 1995 and 2010. Overall, the percentage of produced energy produced from coal declined in all four countries over the timeframe.
To begin, energy production in Denmark and Germany was the highest and stood 60% and 55%, respectively. However, both countries saw a sharp fall to a level of below 40% in 1998. Then in 2007, the energy production in Germany plunged dramatically to nearly 5%, while Denmark leveled off at 20% between 2004 and 2007. However, at the end of the period in 2010, the percentage of energy production from coal in Germany jumped and overtook Denmark by nearly 5% and reached the level of nearly 20%.
The trend of energy production in Sweden and France was almost identical. Over the course of 15 year the percentage of energy from coal was always higher in Sweden, however, the difference decreased over the timeframe. In 1998 the percentage of coal energy in Sweden stood 45%, the figure in France was lower by 5%. Finally, both countries saw a decrease and finished the period with 30% of coal energy in Sweden and the number was approximately 2% lower in France
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-17 | Ria Fisher | 61 | view |
| 2017-03-29 | mh1999 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the crime rate is increasing, especially among teenagers. What are the reasons behind it? How can we reverse this trend? What punishment methods should be used, in your opinion? 67
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 73
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 73
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The proportion of energy produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Finally, both countries saw a decrease and finished the period with 30% of coal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88349514563 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56601041768 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45145631068 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2150585907 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356229319753 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156853437818 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141342860085 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296755506903 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.203671073674 0.0819641961636 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.