The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001
and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of English and French language teachers during the
period between 2001 and 2007. It can be seen clearly the recruitment rate of French-languages
teacher was higher than the figure for English-languages teachers over the period.
- According to the data, there was a significant dipped in the large number of French teachers in
2002, from 70 percent to 54 percent. After this, the figure increased to 67 percent in 2003 and
then fluctuated, before climbing to 74 percent at the end of period.
- On the other hand, the percentage of English-languages teachers began with 73 percent in
2001, it was higher than the figure for French languages teachers. However, the number of
English teachers went down a lot to 40 percent in 2003, and this was followed by showing
some fluctuation during the period between 2003 and 2005. Finally, the proportion of English
teachers hit in low of under 30 percent in 2007.
- significant rise in world trade 22
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 56
- The two graphs compares that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- incidence of diseases in Someland from 1960 to 1995 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10759493671 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97866764469 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0846346201 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978861807179 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580329721837 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041893207709 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465491226581 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353123555245 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.