Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
In today’s era, old buildings signify culture, value, path breaking architecture and so on, which play a pivotal role in defining any country's prosperity. However, some people are in favour of replacing these old buildings with new one. Thus, I am going to highlight the benefits and their association in bringing more pace in the progress of the country.
To begin with, old buildings are primarily known as a silent story teller, which in itself confine various suspense and valuable information, which may help people in a manifold ways. Firstly, old buildings symbolize the history of any country because old buildings are the most reliable source for determining any country's picture of time immemorial. Secondly, architecture of old buildings have no match in today’s world architecture, and has made people to mull over it, thereby become a matter of deep research, which can assist present architects in bringing more magnificent buildings. For instance, it has been found that historical buildings indirectly ensure huge growth for any country in terms of tourism and many more.
Meanwhile, old buildings act as a bridge in connecting today's world with ancient era, thus enable any country to have rapid progress on account of myriad reasons. Firstly, development of any country combines many factors wherein old buildings take a core part because this makes any country a perfect tourist destination, consequently create recognition in world as a result ensures money flow. In addition, the development of any country lies on people, hence old buildings demonstrate any country's civilization which in turn sometimes make people more patriotic and thus, result harmony and fraternity among people.
In conclusion, I opine that replacement of old buildings with new is just like obliterating history, which is not favourable for any country.
- These days we are seeing an increasing amount of violence on television and this is having a negative impact on children s behaviour Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation’s history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices. How important is it to maintain old bui 100
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 100
- International tourism has become cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of increasing tourism outweigh the disadvantages? 100
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...on, which may help people in a manifold ways. Firstly, old buildings symbolize the h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41724137931 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95190339449 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1264879713 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.818181818 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3636363636 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296828489293 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138314148094 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800616039713 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204149151411 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033146055478 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.