Rembrandt
The article states that one famous portrait should not be attributed to Rembrandt and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor says the portrait must be a work by Rembrandt and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
To begin with, the reading states that the way the woman in the portrait is dressed is inconsistent with other works by Rembrandt. The author thinks that the coat worn by the woman doesn’t match the other clothes and Rembrandt doesn’t make such a mistake. The professor refutes this point by saying that that mismatch, the collar on the coat, was made by somebody years later than the portrait was drawn.
Second, the article posits that light and shadow, the famous technique of Rembrandt, is not used in this portrait. However, the professor says that if the added collar is removed the contrast of light and shadow is OK in this picture too. According to the professor, the contrast of light and shadow was distinguished by someone who changed this portrait.
Finally, the reading says that the portrait was painted on the glued wood and this doesn’t match the Rembrandt’s style. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the pieces of wood were also added after Rembrandt drew this picture. She thinks that the man who added the collar also added wood because he wanted to make this portrait more luxurious one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03896103896 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63254010867 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 9.63293249378 49.2860985944 20% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.818181818 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239127881976 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120006051845 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919083717367 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173429897729 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596644949476 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.