The reading and the lecture are both about dangerouses of glass for wild birds which is used in building modern architecture. The author of the reading believes that there are a plethora of solutions for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this statement made by the author. In his opinion, non of these solutions are effective.
First of all, the author suggests that architects have to use one-way glass in the buildings. It is mentioned that birds and other animals cannot see through a window, so they will discern that the glass is a solid barrier. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that these glasses are like mirror for animals which are outside. Furthermore, he argues that birds and animals that are outside the building see the reflect of the sky, so they will want to fly through these barriers.
Secondly, the writer contends that painters have to paint various designs on regular window glass. The article notes that people inside the building can see outside through the openings in the design. The lecturer, however, refutes this by asserting that birds would consider these openings as open holes. He elaborates on this by mentioning that they will try to fly through these openings. He mentions that the only way to prevent this event is that to make these openings extremely small that it will make too dark the inside of the house.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the other solution is to make a magnetic field to steer birds not to approach the window glass. The author establishe that based on the rsearches it has revealed that birds use Earth's magnetic field to navigate in their directions. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that birds use this ability when they want to travel long distances. He puts forth the idea that birds use their eyes to find the right direction in the short trips, so magnetic field is not an effective solution in cities that birds di not use this ability.
The reading and the lecture are both about dangerouses of glass for wild birds which is used in building modern architecture. The author of the reading believes that there are a plethora of solutions for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this statement made by the author. In his opinion, non of these solutions are effective.
First of all, the author suggests that architects have to use one-way glass in the buildings. It is mentioned that birds and other animals cannot see through a window, so they will discern that the glass is a solid barrier. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that these glasses are like mirror for animals which are outside. Furthermore, he argues that birds and animals that are outside the building see the reflect of the sky, so they will want to fly through these barriers.
Secondly, the writer contends that painters have to paint various designs on regular window glass. The article notes that people inside the building can see outside through the openings in the design. The lecturer, however, refutes this by asserting that birds would consider these openings as open holes. He elaborates on this by mentioning that they will try to fly through these openings. He mentions that the only way to prevent this event is that to make these openings extremely small that it will make too dark the inside of the house.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the other solution is to make a magnetic field to steer birds not to approach the window glass. The author establishes that based on the experiments it has revealed that birds use Earth's magnetic field to navigate in their directions. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that birds use this ability when they want to travel long distances. He puts forth the idea that birds use their eyes to find the right direction in the short trips, so magnetic field is not an effective solution in cities that birds di not use this ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-03 | Amirhossein76 | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In modern times children learn more from their parent Others believe parents learn more from their children 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In modern times, children learn more from their parent. Others believe parents learn more from their children. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t there are a plethora of solutions for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this...
^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ethora of solutions for this phenomena. The lecturer challenges this statement made...
^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...imals that are outside the building see the reflect of the sky, so they will want to fly th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 22.412803532 223% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80415430267 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4262111857 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474777448071 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0518488901 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9444444444 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410220074124 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145323174999 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176960277086 0.0662205650399 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305380660511 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.295477199632 0.0443174109184 667% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.