Wealthy nations should help poorer countries on humanitarian relief during disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the rich countries should help developing and under-developed countries during crisis. This essay agrees with this statement because wealthy nations have a moral obligation towards humanity and they are well advanced in technologies, emergency plans, and rescue operations.
Firstly, developed nations have a moral obligation to help the nations that are in poverty during disasters. This is because humans should not see other humans suffer, especially when they are aware that their support could have a great impact. Moreover, humans have an innate behaviour to help each other during these situations. For example, it was reported in the Times of India that when there was a heavy storm in Chennai, India, which flooded the whole city, many developed countries offered monetary help, as well as, in rescue operations and it helped the state to recover very quickly.
Secondly, Wealthy countries own sophisticated technologies and effective plans to handle any disasters. The main reason why poorer countries could not help themselves is because neither do they have enough money to handle disaster needs nor advanced systems to handle recovery in these situations. For example, when a group of Thai students got trapped in cave because of a heavy rainfall, many countries such as the USA and the UK, offered their advanced technologies, which played a crucial role in the rescue operation.
In conclusion, wealthy countries have helped the poorer one’s in the past and would continue to do so because they have a moral obligations to do, as well as, they are well advanced in terms of technologies and emergency procedures, rescue operations etc., which would of great help when a under-developed country is suffering.
- Wealthy nations should help poorer countries on humanitarian relief during disasters. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ued that the rich countries should help developing and under-developed countries during cr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'obligation'?
Suggestion: obligation
...inue to do so because they have a moral obligations to do, as well as, they are well advanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[1]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'would have', or, in informal register, 'would've'.
Suggestion: would have; would've
...ocedures, rescue operations etc., which would of great help when a under-developed count...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ns etc., which would of great help when a under-developed country is suffering. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32014388489 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8276424498 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503597122302 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2166432837 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.9 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264652506389 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118541021706 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684203622133 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175391802441 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250336432038 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.