Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of pointing out the mistake of some person in a meeting or a classroom. Even though, some people believe that it would be better to correct a person's fault in the meeting or classroom because in this case that person is going to remember that point for the rest of his life but in my firm belief it would be better to wait until the end of the class or meeting when the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leaders. In my opinion there are two major reasons about this topic and I will develop them in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, I think when you mention the person's problem in the meeting or classroom full of people, you are going to embarrass that person in front of every one and that could not be appropriate thing to do. I have to admit that my opinion on this issue has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. For instance, when I was high school student, in the biology class, one of my professor explained something about the birds in a wrong way. He actually point out that all birds can fly which is so vivid that it is not true. I interrupted his speech and told him that statement was not true at all and to clarify my point I made an example about Penguins. He did not know what to say. It was obvious that he was embarrassed and he feel ashamed. I found out instantly that what I did was not cool and I should not point out teacher's wrong statement in front of class full of people.
Secondly, in my view when you point out the teacher's wrong saying at the end of the class, there is going to be more time to talk about that point and it is possible that you did not understand his/her assertion in a right way. For instance, when I was chemistry student in the California university, I had a teacher who teach us about different type of toxic materials. She talked really fast and the made us dizzy because we could not understand some of his speech. One time that she talked about Mercury element, I thought she was saying something wrong. My experience from before really help me to not point out that wrong point in front of class full of people. So at the end of the class I tried to talk to her about that point. We talked for couple of hours and I found out that I was my problem and not hers. She was right and I did not understand it because of the way she talked at that point. For the reasons like this I believe that It is better to wait until the end of the class or meeting to point out the teacher's mistakes.
In the light of above mentioned reasons, I think It is better to wait until the end of the class or meeting and then point out the teacher's mistakes and I believed that it is better because in that case you do not make that person embarrass and also there is going to be more time to talk with the teacher or leaders about the major details of that problems.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 33
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- TPO 4 - Integrated 3
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school Use specific reasons and examples to support your position 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...egin with, I think when you mention the persons problem in the meeting or classroom ful...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sor explained something about the birds in a wrong way. He actually point out that all birds c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...t the birds in a wrong way. He actually point out that all birds can fly which is so ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 751, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'feels'.
Suggestion: feels
... obvious that he was embarrassed and he feel ashamed. I found out instantly that wha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ou did not understand his/her assertion in a right way. For instance, when I was chemistry stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i think, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 31.0 11.0286738351 281% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 93.0 43.0788530466 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.22103386809 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25805406284 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.372549019608 0.524837075471 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.917673884 48.9658058833 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.761904762 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203775868991 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628280471225 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612258046231 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153210041571 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403544766861 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.