the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030
A glance at the graph provided reveals the proportion of population in urban areas among four selected countries from 1970 to 2010 and also gives predictions up to 2030.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, the USA started off with exactly 70% of the population in cities which was higher than the figure for Korean, at about 40%. Over the next 40 years, USA and Korean witnessed a gradual increase in the people lived in urban areas in USA and Korean to nearly 90% and 85% respectively and both countries are projected to rise slightly, at roughly 90% in 2030.
However, the percentage of residents in cities in China and Indian were equal and lowest at 20% at the beginning of the period. After that, China remained constant in the proportion of population in cities before climbing to overtake the figure for Indian in 2000 and it is expected to rise over 65% in 2030. While there was a gradual increase in rate of people live in cities in India over the 40-years period and also it is predicted to continue to go up to approximately in 2030.
Overall, it is clear that there were upward trends observed in all four countries between 1970 and 2010, and all of them are projected to rise by 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | dataimielts | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | thanhzjzj | 82 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | adamneyul | 42 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | thiên định | view | |
| 2020-05-11 | thiên định | view |
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- many employees may work at home with modern technologies 84
- Many people believe that it is important to protect the environment, but they make no effort to protect it themselves.Why do you think it is the case?What actions do you think that individuals can do to protect the environment? 84
- Essay topics: The table shows the number of miles of passengers traveled on five types of transport in a European country in 1995 and 2005. It also shows a projection of the year 2015 61
- More and more people now choose to wear the fashionable clothes. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56422018349 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45928464591 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52752293578 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.0558926547 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.142857143 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194379320578 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088084894379 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0204878093209 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10976022636 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025358262366 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.