Households with a regular use of a car , Great Britain
The given line graph describes the percentage of families using cars in England during the period of 36 years , starting from 1971 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of households with no car and one car shared a decrease while the opposite was true for that with two cars and three or more cars.
In 1971, being just nearly 48%, the percentage of families with no car experienced a sharp downward trend to 30% in 1995 while that with one car fluctuated slightly, standing at approximately 45%. Then, this figure for households with a car still continued this trend and fell minimally to 44% but it end 1st place at the end of period. From 1995 to 2007, the proportion of families with no car still dropped gradually to 25%, a half of starting value.
On the other hand, in 1971, standing at above 7%, the rate of households using two cars saw a dramatic rise to 21%, nearly 5 times as much as that with three or more cars in 1995. After 1995, this figure for families with two cars continued a significant increase, nearly 20% more than that with three or more cars, being at 27% and 7% respectively in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The charts show information about the number of Kilometres travelled in an average month and in the distribution of vehicle types in Britain 10
- The map shows 2 possible sites for the supermarket 56
- The process shows how plants create food 56
- The proportion of carbohydrates , protein and fat in three different diets 56
- Households with a regular use of a car , Great Britain 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in England during the period of 36 years , starting from 1971 to 2007. Overall, i...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ends'?
Suggestion: ends
... trend and fell minimally to 44% but it end 1st place at the end of period. From 19...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47572815534 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4441484612 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.6504202211 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298460560179 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163450693678 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616423517948 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201297527601 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607177367805 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.