Many problems cannot be solved by laws and legal system because moral behaviors cannot be legislated.
It is true that the many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and legal system. Some moral problems are hard to judge by laws for the reason that moral behaviors the attribute of the person himself so it sometimes deviates from legal system. However, the importance of laws should not be easily ignored.
Law, being one of the cornerstones of our society, has its great importance on balancing individual rights with our obligations and guarantees us a harmonious, and fair society. After all, Law serves a variety of functions. Laws against crimes, for example, help to maintain a peaceful, orderly, relatively stable society. It is judicious to say that without laws, people’s happiness and well-being cannot be guaranteed. Thus, laws are the most disinterested systems which maintain society’s functionality and balance. Without laws, our civilization will be a complete chaos and disorder for the reason that we cannot judge everything from our various moral standard. For instance, the movie The Purge takes place in the future, in which one certain day in a year, all crime is legal, thus people break the law unscrupulously and bear no consequences. Sky high rate of violence and murder leads to instability of society and pandemic panic in every individual. The movie shows how devastating the consequences are without law.
Nonetheless, Laws are intended to impose morality impinge upon our freedom of choice. People can always find a way to circumvent such laws, which ultimately give way to more lenient laws that acknowledge personal freedom of choice. We are gradually learning from history that legislating morality merely for morality’s sake simply does not work. For instance, some countries like China ban euthanasia because euthanasia which helps patient suicide may cause heavily moral conflicts and tremendous social impacts. There are heavily debate on whether euthanasia should be allowed or not. Some people believe that euthanasia may increase number of suicide people, but others assert that it is best way for people who suffer from incurable diseases to put a comma to their lives. Sadly, laws are inflexible and hard to respond quickly to this kind of new ideas. Consequently, people who are in great suffer cannot put an end to their lives, causing severe burdens to both family and society.
To sum up, it is undeniable that setting laws help our society to become better, however some ethics issues are not supposed to merely judge by laws. What’s more, only combining laws and moral concepts can we reach true harmony.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-14 | chensixian12 | 83 | view |
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends and concepts that help explain those facts. 66
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 63
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions. 70
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partnersh 82
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 693, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...icide people, but others assert that it is best way for people who suffer from incurabl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, after all, for example, for instance, kind of, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21291866029 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79162411878 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574162679426 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7401693281 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0454545455 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338381177839 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100240987924 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120043212964 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234746328312 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177170858541 0.0667264976115 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.