The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart depicts information on the proportion of students from six countries who shows proficiency in studying a foreign language. The study is categorized according to sex and is measured in percentage.
Generally, it can be seen that almost all countries show that more women exceed in learning a foreign language than men. It is also clear that the highest percentage of those who are proficient are Indians.
In the female category, most of the learners who are proficient in a foreign country are Indians with at about 68 %. It is closely followed by Romanians with 65 % and those in Vietnam with just above 55 % while Russians had over 40 %. China had 30 % which is more than half that of the figure in for Romanians while Thais students account to less than 30 %.
Looking at the male category, Indians had the similar figure as that of Vietnamese female students while Romanians had over 40 %. Vietnamese and Russian male participants had about 35 % while those in Thailand had about 30 %. Chinese male attendees had the lowest figure with about 18 %. By comparison, this is three times less than that of Indians in the same category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
- It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books".Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?Give reasons for your answer and 73
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence. 73
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89743589744 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65732350932 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548717948718 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9955229984 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8181818182 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156134029428 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657349204374 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730327547922 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108904095871 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564623783559 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.