The graph below gives information about Dubai gold sales in 2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The one-line graph given reveals the amount of gold sold in Dubai over twelve-year period of the year 2002.
Overall, the gold sales experienced fluctuation throughout from the beginning until the end and had a little decline compared to the initial data in January. In addition, they stayed at their highest in April with 350 million of dirhams while the amount of sold gold in July and September were at the same level.
The figure stood at 200 million of dirhams at the first month of the survey. After that, the statistic went up by approximately 50 million of dirhams, followed by a tremendous upward until they reached the peak among all given data with 350 million of dirhams in March. The four next year, the studied number of gold sales plunged by roughly 260 million of dirhmas resulting in merely about 140 million of dirhams consumed in July and September, although the data was demonstrated to have a slight increase with the same number as in August. The three ultimate months of survey illustrated a minimal growth in selling and end up at lower 200 million of Durhams in December.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The Diagram below show the process of milk production 56
- The pie chart below show the main reason why agriculture land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of world during the 1990. 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75392670157 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49542219508 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4926299212 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0741884305756 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369150630336 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413758361297 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676935338186 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038177911699 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.