People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Humans are called organic machines. They have this unusual combination of a logical side and an emotional side. Human psychology is a complex matter to analyze. Because they are governed by both logic and emotion, there is always a winning side of these two regarding decision making. The prompt presents a statement about how the chronological sequence of thinking logically and thinking emotionally can affect any decision making process. This statement has merits to a good extent.
To begin, whenever we have to make a decision, we can either think and evaluate logically how this decision is going to affect us, or maybe we can have a nonchalant concern towards the logical side and just do whatever it feels like. This is okay in the cases that are not too critical. For instance, if certain medical professionals are deciding on using an expensive drug to save the life of a patient, they can think this in two ways. They can either think that they would have to use it because there is no other better option right now, or they could think that this might cost a lot for the family of the patient financially. If, in this case, the emotional decision is chosen, then there might be a chance of failure. And to make matters worse, if they try to back up their emotional decision by logic by saying that they considered the money thing over saving the life of a patient, then it is very upsetting. So, this example illustrates how in critical situations, logical reasoning should surpass any emotional thinking.
Further, Before taking a decision, whatever that might be, it is advisable to at least think of the consequences resulting from this decision. Even when people have to make very day-to-day decisions, they should at least think about the result. For example, students have a tendency to skip studies and do other non-important tasks. They might reason it as "not feeling like it". But they need to address the negative results coming from this decision. Because, if they do ignore their duties, they might have to suffer in one or another way.
However, people might argue that they do not always have to be logical. There are certain conditions where they do not have to use the brain, for example, watching a movie. If someone has to choose a movie to watch, they would certainly go for movies matching their mood. This is not a very significant decision and might not harm the person in the long run, so this might be okay.
In conclusion, decision making can affect the individual in any ways. So in case of extreme conditions or delicate situations, people should always go with the brain. They should not make an emotional decision and back it up by logic, because that just proves they are careless. Nonetheless, whether the decision is significant or minor, their relative merits should at least be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 58
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories hig 3
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio."We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only prev 46
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villag 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84662576687 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58676252629 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468302658487 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.382458713 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185919848687 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613806508862 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712497795003 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136389358432 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906139142389 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.