Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support.
The question “Can hosting sporting events such as the Olympic and the World cup bring benefits to the host countries?” has always been a controversial issue and has generated a myriad of arguments among people all around the world. Hosting sporting events is widely held to have been beneficial; yet, I tend to believe that we need to analyze the matter more closely.
From a social viewpoint, infrastructures are indeed bound to international standards, which can lead to both sports stadiums and hosting villages. For instance, a body of sport competition organizers, working at a renowned academic setting, conducted a series of thorough studies to develop a better understanding of the correlation between hosting sports events and beneficial achievements. The studies have confirmed that not only are they both related and linked, but also, they play an integral role in promoting own countries to other destinations.
Moreover, in sport tourism term, an increasing number of sport tourists is undoubtedly attributable to raising sports competitions in that it would lead to a decreasing rate of unemployment and social vitality as well as economic success. A well-known example of such attributions is Qatar, which is the cause for a raft of discussions. This vividly proves that investment in social events, hosting sports competitions and social welfare play an integral role in understanding the whole topic.
To recapitulate, I tend to consider all the aforementioned arguments as valid; however, we need to be as cautious as possible when it comes to scrutinizing such an important issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | simin2019 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | angelstrack | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | محمدرضا سلیمی | 88 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37549407115 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25205420007 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5919149125 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.111111111 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257182289517 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990464798033 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818510182971 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140031968401 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979290879371 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.