The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line chart illustrates the figure for waste which three different companies manufactured between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the quantity of waste produced by the company A was the mostly highest from 2000 except the period between 2013 and 2015. In addition, there were decreases in the amount of waste which the company A and B produced while this figure of company C saw a gradual increase.
Looking at the figure in 2000, at 12 tones, waste produced by the company A was the highest in comparison with company B and C represented at under 9 tones and just over 3 tones of waste respectively. The five following years, the company A declined gradually the amount of waste produced to about 11 tones in 2005. At the same period, there were a significant rise in the figure for waste of the company B to around 10 tones and the company C to 6 tones in 2005.
From 2005, the company A continued to cut down its waste to approximate 8 tones in 2015. At the same trend with the company A, waste of the company B witnessed a dramatic decline to 3 tones in 2005 while this of the company C increased sharply from 6 tones in 2005 to around 10 tones in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 61
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 67
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpany A was the mostly highest from 2000 except the period between 2013 and 2015....
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the company C increased sharply from 6 tones in 2005 to around 10 tones in 20...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39908256881 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53425318163 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426605504587 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1272540317 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288609547584 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162367483243 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498286185175 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193309165724 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688113714229 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.