The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie charts compare the population in Yemen and Italy in terms of age distribution in 2000, as well as projected to 2050.
It is predicted that people between 15 and 59 years old would make up the largest proportion of Yemen’s total population (57.3%), increasing from 46.3% in 2000. On the contrary, the figure for the same age group in Italy is likely to show a different pattern, dropping from 61.6% to 46.2%. In 2000, the 0-to-14-year-old age group accounted for half of Yemen’s total population, but this figure is projected to decline to 37% during the next 50 years. This group was the smallest age group in Italy, making up only 14.3% of its population in 2000 and is predicted to further fall to 11.5% in 2050.
The percentage of elderly people (those who are over 60 years old) would see a considerable increase in Italy, with the figure almost double from 24.1% to 42.3%. A slight rise is also expected in the same group in Yemen, probably climbing to 5.7% in 2050.
Overall, it could be concluded that both the two countries are likely to experience population ageing, having a smaller younger population and more elderly people, especially Italy, where people aged over 60 would be the largest group. People of 15-to-59 years old would make up the largest percentage in Yemen.
- Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trends, and concepts that those facts illustrate. 75
- Should Super Screen spend more on advertising? 45
- The chart shows how urban refuse is assorted for recycling. 84
- Surveys conducted in 1982 and 2002 show different pictures of what motivate students to choose a college or university in the UK. 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67585085118 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537777777778 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8659574411 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291709551345 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141165887132 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128441398622 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217779879505 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165279678684 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.