In some countries, it is now possible for people to buy products made in other countries. To what extent do the benefits of this development outweigh the problems?
As the world becoming increasingly globalised, the exchange of domestics across borders is undergoing at an astounding rate. From my point of view, this trend can boost consumer’s living standards.
Imported goods are beneficial to consumers in several aspects, one of which being that these products are usually competitively priced. The main reason is that countries export these merchants are generally well-equipped with required technologies and knowledge to control manufacturing costs and thereby ensure the prices are affordable. For example, China has expertise in producing textile products, so these products are usually cheaper than their domestic counterparts in many parts of the world. In addition, goods imported overseas challenge the dominance of domestic manufacturers and intensify competition, which forces these domestic producers to lower prices. This also benefits local consumers as they can reduce their living expenses. It is also worth noting that more diverse options are provided for consumers when shopping. For instance, imported food can alleviate the food shortage caused by abnormal weather.
On the other hand, the downside of importing goods is that the buying country can develop an excessive reliance on imports and hence lead to the underdevelopment of certain domestic industries. For example, many countries buy computers from other countries and as a consequence, some local manufacturers go bankrupt. This can be detrimental to a self-contained economy. What’s more, transports of goods across borders can cause huge pollution since shipping by air is involved.
Therefore, it is reasonable to think that importing products from other countries has an overall positive influence on consumers as they can acquire products at a lower price, although some local companies may go out of business consequently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | J a Hermione | 61 | view |
- recycle of urban refuse 84
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. 66
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The graph show the saving of individual in different countries for the year 1970, 1990 and 2000.pie chart 11
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7797833935 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11496077345 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2884430554 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123595595452 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436895916728 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339242672806 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763840808376 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388090624289 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.