Some people say that E-book and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
In the contemporary era, it is a heated argument over the issue that, a few society members believe that E- books and cutting-edge technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines, while others contemplate vice versa as different people have their distinct mindset. The following paragraphs would shed light on both the approaches before making final note.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad arguments discussing that technology is playing indispensable role in the modern society. The prominent reason is that, since the use of technology, especially internet, and gives wider range of opt for user to read magazine and newspaper in any languages and thus helps to accumulate knowledge in distinct fields and broaden their mental horizon. In contrast, to this traditional newspapers provide loads of local knowledge that can keep one updated with the surroundings. What is more, if individual is read newspaper and magazine through E-book their plethora of merit , it would help to people can read E-book as per their convenient by use of different electronic devices. Hence, it can ameliorate a source of information for extremely easily at any part of the world.
Shifting towards the second school of thought. There are a range of reasons why some people are against this argument . The first and foremost is that, traditional newspapers and magazines always acquire authentic news because it has been written by a renowned writer. As a result, it provided authentic news through these sources. In addition to that, instead of using E-book, people have been like to read by traditional newspaper, because individual can find dilemma to read long time through screen, which is lead to several diseases such as eyesight damage, mental illness . Finally, every person likes to read newspaper every morning with cup tea and coffee, which is more effective way to read and enrich their mental horizon.
In conclusion, having discussed the arguments and counter arguments. I would like to infer that although it has both merits and demerits regarding these arguments, I believe that it will more difficult to replace traditional newspaper and magazine by an E-book in near the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | amrezaeian | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | suraj ashok bhai | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | jessey | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | SNEHA S.R | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e through E-book their plethora of merit , it would help to people can read E-book...
^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hy some people are against this argument . The first and foremost is that, traditi...
^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as eyesight damage, mental illness . Finally, every person likes to read ne...
^^
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...such as eyesight damage, mental illness . Finally, every person likes to read new...
^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gazine by an E-book in near the future.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, regarding, second, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29943502825 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77030104255 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567796610169 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.0017481278 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.066666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231434319944 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670082775683 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658518979301 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144786190813 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232303881909 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.