Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
A nation is made of not only it’s major cities. A nation becomes a nation with all of its cities, towns and villages. The government is there to govern the whole nation, not just the major cities. The statement asserts that the government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are generated and preserved. In my opinion I strongly disagree with the author and his statement for obvious reasons.
First of all, the author's statement that the city is the primary place where the cultural tradition of a nation is generated and preserved is not true at all. A nation's culture lives and breathes in its villages. A city is where culture and values suffocate surrounded by buildings and people running around who does not have time to stop. For example, we can talk about Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a country of culture, color and beauty. Villages of these country produced poet like Kazi Nazrul Islam, artists like Joynul Abedin. Villages are the place where we have shepherds lying under a tree playing his flute, or singing a song. So saving cultural traditions is the purpose then saving the villages should be the priority.
Additionally, the government is not in a position to decide what parts of the nation need to survive and which parts are not. They are there to govern the whole nation. Their duty is to save, to improve the whole nation. Even if they decide to do that, they choose the city to save, this approach can backfire in so many ways. For instance, let’s say there’s an agricultural country, where it’s government decide to save the city, and abandon the villages, what will happen? Village is the place where agriculture and farming mostly happens, hey just left the nation’s main source of income and livelihood, and also the place where the culture of the nation resides for dead. There’s no doubt that the country will suffer greatly for this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | kexyu | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Dhrubo Chowdhury | 50 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | haps_01 | 50 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | BigSize2Shots | 79 | view |
| 2016-12-04 | ratanpes16 | 58 | view |
- Men and women employed in full-time jobs should share theresponsibilities of household chores. Do you agree or disagree?Share relevant personal experiences. 73
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 42
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 58
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his statement for obvious reasons. First of all, the authors statement that...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... reasons. First of all, the authors statement that the city is the primary ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e villages should be the priority. Additionally, the government is not in a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, for example, for instance, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97376093294 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59503061369 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527696793003 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8710265356 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347858065564 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102931590247 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15594173404 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249462211812 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153051984524 0.0667264976115 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.