Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Children possess a great capability to learn new skills in their teenage. Parents play a paramount role in inculcating virtues in them. Some people feel that parents should encourage their children to participate in group activities, however there are others who oppose this dogma and support the thought of children engaging themselves on their own. The merits of both arguments will be analyzed before a conclusion is decided upon.
Group learning and sports events help children to learn important social and behavioral skills that are essential for every human to sustain life. Moreover, motivating children to participate in group activities prevent them from falling prey to wrong lifestyles. For example, organizing football match in the evening for the students not only helps to keep them physically fit, but also aids in holistic personality development. Students are under the supervision of either parents or tutor, thus organized activities are best way to engage children in some fruitful exercise.
However, some people have strong reasons to oppose the group activities and have the notion that children can learn maximum by their own. They believe that self growth is going to help kids in long run as they would have capability to take decisions on their own. For instance, giving some money to a kid to allow him to purchase something useful will definitely make him to brainstorm, in order to find a useful item, without seeking anybody’s help. Thus, it is felt that children may be allowed to decide freely on the things to keep themselves busy in their leisure time.
After looking at these two opposing points of view, it is felt that organized group activities better serve the purpose of imbibing good behavioral and social traits in children, whereas letting the children grow alone might make the children self-centred and materialistic. Thus, it is hoped that more supervised cooperative activities be organized for the teenagers in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | umarshahid | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | niravparmar | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Milan Desai | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | garrimtoss | 61 | view |
- Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree? 78
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measurements will be needed. Discuss both sides. 84
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem. What are the causes of this? How can this problem be solved? 73
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised to access to the internet in order to meet and chat with their friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations What solutions can you suggest to deal w 80
- News plays an important part of most people’s lives. Why is news so important to people? Why is so much news dedicated to bad news? Should the news focus on good news instead? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...nts or tutor, thus organized activities are best way to engage children in some fruitful...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27672955975 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72357726277 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4365329334 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421947596573 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131660358863 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934409816005 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243349902022 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068726150569 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.