Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Human beings have to make an important decision in every step of their life such as find a job, marriage, bring a baby, to name but a few. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among psychologist about positive and negative effects decisions in an individual's life. Some psychologist believe that adult persons have enough perspective to make their important decisions on their own. Others, on the other hand, advocate the idea that people should consider other's perspective in their decisions. I personally, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, different people have different perspectives that could be very helpful in ultimate decision. In other words, individuals according to their characteristics see different aspects of an issue. If a person considers different idea from different people to make a decision, he/she can make a rational decision. For example, I can recall when I decided to start a business. I think with myself that I considered all aspects of the matter. When I talked to my father about my planning, he asked me are you planning to rent a place for this work. I became shocked that I did not think to this issue. Had I not talked to my father that day, I would have faced to a big dilemma in my job.
Secondly, sometimes people are not in good mood to make a correct decision, so they need to take guide from trustful people. For example, my first boyfriend hurt me a lot. When I decided to cut with him, I was very emotional and I could not take a correct action for my life. I consulted with imitate friend and she confirmed my decision, so I became confident with my decision.
To sum up, some of our wrong measures for our life cannot compensatable later. Therefore, people should gather as much information as possible from intellectual people to be satisfied with their decision. This because a person cannot see all the aspects of an issue and they may not be in proper mental circumstances to take a thoughtful measure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | HHH | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Shashank Deshmukh | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | ghazalsaed1995 | 60 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | ghazalsaed1995 | 60 | view |
- planting the genetically modified trees 85
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Tpo 23yellow cedar 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ve and negative effects decisions in an individuals life. Some psychologist believe that ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80790960452 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84233576659 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516949152542 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6428478928 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0476190476 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139345211885 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421406735644 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341976575324 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872092050979 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487520363878 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.