about agricultural land degradation
Given are two figures concerning agricultural land’s degradation. A glance at the table provided reveals some considerable information regarding the main causes of land degradation based upon three regions (North America, Europe, and Oceania) in the 1990s, while the pie chart brings different reasons of land degradation.
It is evident from the information provided that over-grazing had by far the highest degradation percentages. Also apparent is the fact that deforestation and over-cultivation are more likely to degrade productivity respectively by 30% and 28%, meanwhile, other sources just have 7% contribution.
With regard to regions, Europe suffers considerably from deforestation by 9.8%, while over-grazing and over-cultivation are among the highest causes of land degradation in Oceania and North America by 11.3% and 1.5%, respectively. one particularly interesting fact is that North America and Europe have got the lowest and highest total land degraded respectively by 5% and 23%, however, Oceania has just 13%.
It is interesting to note that land degradation caused by over-cultivation is absolute zero in Oceania
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ar the highest degradation percentages. Also apparent is the fact that deforestation...
^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...merica by 11.3% and 1.5%, respectively. one particularly interesting fact is that N...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8630952381 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49914449376 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0946366631 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.714285714 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269388196472 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139243832633 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052735182343 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174378472018 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563142735975 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.