The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
The pie charts depict the proportion of three age groups of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the projected percentage for 2050. Three groups consist of children under 14 years old, people who fall into 15 to 59 age group and the elderly people.
Overall, the proportion of age groups in Yemen and Italy are planned to change with the same trend. The number of children under 14 years old is set to decrease while that of elderly people is likely to increase.
In 2000, the proportion of children under 14 years old in Yemen occupied about half of the population when that in Italy accounted for only 14,3%. It is anticipated that in 2050, this proportion in Yemen and Italy will decline to exactly 37% and 11,5% respectively. In contrast, the percentage of the elderly is projected to rise by 2% in Yemen and doubled from 24% in Italy.
On the other hand, when the proportion of 15 to 59-year-old people in Yemen occupied just over two fifths in 2000, this figure in Italy made up more than three fifths. Yemen’s government planned to rise this figure to 57%. By contrast, Italy’s government is likely to reduce the percentage of people between 15 and 59 years old.
- The diagram below show the development of the village of Kelsbey between 1780 and 2000Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts show the main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The aging population is good for business, the economy and society. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 73
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71634615385 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55066994332 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7947756102 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271177370973 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127090242576 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122062325498 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181476424858 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831909652433 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.