Today people are surrounded by advertising. This affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of the Internet, advertisements, originally displayed only on TV, billboards, posters and so on, are becoming increasingly ubiquitous and commonplace for the general public. In my view, this kind of impact could be both crucial and, on a certain level, detrimental.
On the one hand, this phenomenon could denote that although we have already had a diverse range of advertisement, people are still capable of inventing innovative approaches catering for all kinds of requirements of advertising. It is a symbol that demonstrates the creativity rooted in human beings. Apart from that, it also represents that the speed of spreading information is conspicuously escalating. More purposeful is, therefore, the fact that, besides booming of the advertising, it constitutes a major reason why people could be so prosperous in this digital age.
On the other hand, there are various unpleasant consequences as well. Firstly, with the omnipresent advertisement, it could potentially cause people to do impulsive shopping. Secondly, the advertisement, if regulated in a mismanaged method, could make people constantly feel uncomfortable or annoyed. In this sense, instead of being an instrumental tool to promote amenities, advertisements could be considered a hindrance when people are frequently blocked by them. Furthermore, it would cost one precious time to have to sift the helpful ad from a host of others.
In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, advertising is a beneficial phenomenon for all with a number of insignificant drawbacks. I believe that in the future we can improve the way advertising is done at present, and embrace the positive influence of advertising even further in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Prachi Agrawal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Santhosh Mankala | 78 | view |
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•Explain the reasons for the noise•Apologise•Describe what action you take. 73
- Some People say that now we can see films our phones or tablets. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in theatre. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- Some People say that now we can see films our phones or tablets. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in theater. Discuss both the views and give your opinion 78
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•Explain the reasons for the noise•Apologise•Describe what action you take. 73
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter•Explain the reasons for the noise•Apologise•Describe what action you take. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ngly ubiquitous and commonplace for the general public. In my view, this kind of impact could ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44237918216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40624730383 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2509235475 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143936245005 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455073667342 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517671198484 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743161735888 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584898978189 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.