Educators should find out what students want to be included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
The author of the statement claim that the Educators should find out what students want to be included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. Many of us argue that the statement will hold all the time, while others will counter this providing the example and different scenarios. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
Universities are the place where students get an opportunity to pursue what they want to. And, it will be a good initiative, if the educator starts to include them in making the curriculum of their class. This one step can revolutionize the education system. Through this step, the students can bring their thoughts and can suggest to them what is important for them to learn something which is not present in the current curriculum.
Moreover, this will also improve the relationship among the teachers and students and can lead to the cordial relationship between them. Students will be more attentive and attend the college with more enthusiasm than they had before. And there will also improvement in the academic performance of the students.
But as know, every coin has two sides and this initiative also as this can create chaos, if the opinion or suggestion regarding the curriculum varies from the student to student, for example, if an educator has to make a curriculum of a class of 60 and all the sixty has different thought or suggestion for their curriculum, then the educator won't be able to decide the curriculum for the class. So, we have to answer what should educator do in a scenario like this. And another question what if conflict may occur between the teacher and the student or who will have the final decision-making power.
In nutshell, we can say that this is a good initiative that would revolutionize the education system as the students also have their sake in the making of their curriculum but we should have to answer the following question mention above.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 66
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 63
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 70
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 262, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sixty' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sixties'.
Suggestion: sixties
...curriculum of a class of 60 and all the sixty has different thought or suggestion for...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87683284457 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6789205416 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495601173021 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.9580799189 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395378702395 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150494518638 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201230175867 0.0758088955206 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213672825998 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985351695918 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.